|
K&N has millions of satisfied customers, yet we do
occasionally get instances where a dealership or service provider has blamed our product for
a vehicle problem. We attempt to resolve these misunderstandings by speaking directly to
the service technicians. In any event, we
take care of the consumer through our
Consumer Protection Pledge. In issues regarding MAF sensors, we have been
able to recover many of the allegedly “bad” sensors and test
them to diagnose the actual cause of the failure. In most of these cases the "bad" sensor was
actually functioning properly and was misdiagnosed by the dealership or
service provider. The diagram below is a summary of our
findings.

Of the 59 sensors
we received that were truly malfunctioning, 26 had a complete electronic
failure in which the sensor's voltage output was a flat line,
generally caused by a connection or circuitry problem within
the sensor. When a sensor is responsive but it's voltage output
is not within the normal limits we refer to this as "out of range".
This condition can be caused by circuitry problems and it can also be
caused by a sensor's thermistor becoming dirty or contaminated.
We sent 19 out of range sensors to an independent laboratory for
an elemental and chemical analysis and all of them were found to have
silicone as the contaminant.
Silicone is used
on the circuitry of these sensors because it acts as an excellent
thermal and electrical insulator, inherently sticks to most surfaces,
and is resistant to moisture and heat. Some MAF sensors use a high
temperature burn-off cycle to eliminate normal engine contaminants
from the sensor. Silicone is resistant to this process.
Thermistors
are used in MAF sensors to measure the transfer of heat from the
thermistor to the air passing by the sensor. A thermistor's
resistance changes as its surrounding temperature changes. The greater the air
mass and air flow the greater the transfer of heat. When a thermistor is
"silicone contaminated" the thermistor becomes insulated and can
result in an out of range condition.
In addition to out of range sensors, functioning and failed sensors have
also been sent to an independent forensic laboratory for analysis. A few of these
sensors were found to have trace amounts of oil on the thermistor.
The amount of oil was so minimal that an accurate analysis of
the oil's source could not be determined. The trace amount
of oil can conceivably be found from two possible sources: fuel in the combustion chamber or motor oil used as an engine
lubricant that gets suspended in crankcase vapor. Our experience in the lab is that trace amounts of oil
don't change the sensitivity of the sensor enough to cause an "out of
range" electronic signal. Furthermore our testing has shown
that K&N air filter oil will not come off a K&N air filter even in
extreme conditions. More on this topic here.
As of the date of our last test shown below, K&N air filter oil cannot be confirmed as the source of
contamination on a sensor nor can any oil type be attributed to a
sensor’s failure.
|
MORE DETAILS ON
SILICONE & TESTING Mass Air Flow Sensor
Electronic Testing at K&N:
The MAF sensor is placed on a test bench
designed and built by K&N Engineering. The test bench can
flow air through the sensor at variable flow rates, ranging from
idle to full throttle. The flow of a sensor is then compared
to a new sensor. |
 |
| |
MAF Sensor
Test Bench
|
 |
|
 |
|
Example of Sensor
reading Normal |
|
Example of Sensor
reading Out of Range |
|
 |
|
Example of Failed
Sensor (flat line) |
Microscopic
Examination:

|
|
When a service technician looks at a MAF
sensor's thermistor what they see with their naked eye is very little. It is nearly impossible to
determine if a MAF sensor's thermistor is dirty or clean from looking at it
without magnification and good lighting. When K&N views a MAF sensor, we look at it under a
microscope. Below are sample images under microscopic view.
|
 |
|
 |
|
Example of Clean
Thermistor |
|
Example of a
Contaminated Thermistor |
A MAF sensor is located
under the hood of your vehicle and is subject to a heat, cold,
vibration, etc., in other words, a hostile environment. An engine
performing as expected can contribute to contaminating a MAF sensor. The
presence of gas fumes, a vehicle backfiring, combustion blow-by and even
water condensation can contribute to contamination of a sensor. Ironically, the
presence of contamination does not necessarily conclude the sensor is
not functioning properly and requires replacement.
Independent Forensic
Analysis:
An elemental and chemical analysis of
the contamination has more often than not shown to be silicone. K&N
filter oil does not contain silicone. The silicone can actually be
traced to the sensor’s housing of the electronic circuitry. The silicone
can seep out of the housing area onto the sensor.
 |
|
MAF sensor thermistor probes connect to the
circuit board. Silicone covers the circuit electronics and
it can seep down contaminating the thermistor. This photo shows
the silicone compound
referenced, covering/protecting the electronics. The probes leading to
the thermistor are connected to the underside of this circuit
board. |
 |
|
This photo shows a probe
demonstrating the stickiness of the silicone material. |
 |
|
This photo shows a sensor
with silicone covering the electronics. Note the small gold processor in center. |
 |
|
This photo is a close up of the
processor under the silicone. |
 |
|
This photo is an extreme
magnification of the processor. As can be seen, this is a complex
sensor with thousands of connections and components all of which
must be intact for the sensor to function properly. |
Below is a more
detailed summary of our actual test results.
| |
Quantity |
Initial Sensor
Test |
Electronic Test
Result |
Microscopic
Examination |
Independent
Laboratory Chemical Analysis |
Probable Cause |
|
Electrical Conduction Failure
within Sensors |
13 |
Bad |
Failure |
Clean |
N/A |
Electrical Failure |
|
8 |
Bad |
Failure |
Dirty |
N/A |
Electrical Failure |
|
1 |
Bad |
Failure |
Dirty |
Silicone |
Electrical Failure |
|
1 |
Bad |
Failure |
Dirty |
Trace Oil |
Electrical Failure |
|
2 |
Bad |
Failure |
De-lamination |
N/A |
Manufacturing Defect |
|
9 |
Bad |
Out of Range |
Clean |
N/A |
Electrical Failure |
|
5 |
Bad |
Out of Range |
Dirty |
N/A |
Electrical Failure |
|
19 |
Bad |
Out of Range |
Dirty |
Silicone |
Electrical Failure |
|
1 |
Bad |
N/A |
Dirty |
Silicone |
Severe Silicone Leak |
|
59 BAD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normally Functioning Sensors * |
44 |
Good |
Normal |
Clean |
N/A |
Sensor Never Failed |
|
25 |
Good |
Normal |
Dirty |
N/A |
Sensor Never Failed |
|
2 |
Good |
Normal |
Dirty |
Dirt |
Sensor Never Failed |
|
13 |
Good |
Normal |
Dirty |
Silicone |
Sensor Never Failed |
|
1 |
Good |
Normal |
Dirty |
Trace Oil |
Sensor Never Failed |
|
2 |
Good |
Normal |
Dirty |
Trace Oil & Silicone |
Sensor Never Failed |
|
87 GOOD |
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Failure: Electrical issue within
sensor compared to a new sensor's specifications
Manufacturing Defect: A layer of the membrane sensor peels back causing
electrical failure - known as de-lamination
Sensor Never Failed: Service provider error; sensor was not
malfunctioning
Severe Silicone Leak: The silicone leak was too severe to run on
the test stand
* Well over 50% of the damaged sensors sent to us were functioning
properly meaning they were never damaged in the first place and cannot
be attributed to any vehicle problem. Click here for more information on
how this may happen.
Below is the list of MAF sensors that were sent to K&N
for testing.
The list includes dealerships that misdiagnosed the problem and blamed a K&N product
for the failure. Test results are also shown.
|
Dealership |
Date |
Vehicle |
Initial Sensor Test |
Electronic Test Results |
Microscopic Examination |
Indep. Lab Chem Analysis |
|
Michael Automotive Chevrolet, Fresno,
CA |
11/28/2006 |
Chevy |
Bad |
Out of Range |
Dirty |
Silicone |
|
Smith South Plains, Levelland, TX |
12/22/2006 |
Ford |
Good |
Normal |
Dirty |
N/A |
|
Auburn Toyota, Auburn, CA |
1/12/2004 |
Toyota |
Good |
Normal |
Dirty |
N/A |
|
Precision Toyota of Tucson, AZ |
1/19/2004 |
Toyota |
Good |
Normal |
Clean |
N/A |
|
Power Toyota Irvine, CA |
1/20/2004 |
Toyota |
Good |
Normal |
Dirty |
N/A |
|
Rolling Hills Ford, Clearmont, FL |
1/22/2004 |
Ford |
Bad |
Out of Range |
Dirty |
N/A |
|
Precision Toyota of Tucson, AZ |
2/10/2004 |
Toyota |
Good |
Normal |
Dirty |
N/A |
|
Foley-Sweitzer Ford, Benton, IL |
2/12/2004 |
Ford |
Good |
Normal |
Dirty |
N/A |
|
Mossy Toyota, San Diego, CA |
2/15/2004 |
Toyota |
Bad |
Out of Range |
Dirty |
Silicone |
|
Scottsdale Nissan, Scottsdale, AZ |
3/9/2004 |
Nissan |
Bad |
Failure |
Clean |
N/A |
|
Sullivan Brothers Nissan, Kingston, MA |
3/31/2004 |
Nissan |
Good |
Normal |
Clean |
N/A |
|
Thousand Oaks Toyota, Thousand Oaks, CA |
4/1/2004 |
Toyota |
Bad |
Out of Range |
Dirty |
N/A |
|
The Beetle Clinic, San Mateo, CA |
4/28/2004 |
VW |
Good |
Normal |
Clean |
N/A |
|
Beach Ford, Myrtle Beach, FL |
6/3/2004 |
Ford |
Bad |
Out of Range |
Dirty |
N/A |
|
Daub Ford L-M, Nazareth, PA |
7/1/2004 |
Ford |
Bad |
N/A |
Dirty |
Silicone |
|
Classic Chevy, Mentor, OH |
7/15/2004 |
Chevy |
Good |
Normal |
Dirty |
N/A |
|
Jim Click Automotive, Tucson, AZ |
8/2/2004 |
Nissan |
Bad |
Out of Range |
Clean |
N/A |
|
Betley Chevrolet-Buick, Derry, NH |
8/18/2004 |
Chevy |
Bad |
Failure |
Dirty |
N/A |
|
Fiore VW, West Warwick, RI |
8/25/2004 |
VW |
Bad |
Out of Range |
Dirty |
N/A |
|
Bernard Chevrolet, Libertyville, IL |
10/11/2004 |
Isuzu |
Bad |
Failure |
Dirty |
N/A |
|
White Bear Lake Pontiac-GMC, White Bear Lake, MN |
10/11/2004 |
GMC |
Good |
Normal |
Clean |
N/A |
|
Don Davis Pontiac-GMC-Honda, Amhurst, NY |
10/18/2004 |
GMC |
Bad |
Failure |
Dirty |
N/A |
|
Bay Chevrolet, Mobile, AL |
11/5/2004 |
Chevy |
Good |
Normal |
Dirty |
N/A |
|
Heartland Chevrolet, Booneville, IN |
11/19/2004 |
Chevy |
Bad |
Failure |
Dirty |
N/A |
|
Russ Dean Ford, Pasco, WA |
12/23/2004 |
Ford |
Good |
Normal |
Dirty |
N/A |
|
El Cajon Ford, El Cajon, CA |
1/7/2005 |
Ford |
Good |
Normal |
Dirty |
N/A |
|
Three Way Chevrolet, Bakersfield, CA |
1/14/2005 |
Chevy |
Good |
Normal |
Clean |
N/A |
|
Tyrrell-Doyle Auto Center, Cheyenne, WY |
2/3/2005 |
Chevy |
Good |
Normal |
Clean |
N/A |
|
Diamond Chevrolet, Charlotte, NC |
3/8/2005 |
Chevy |
Bad |
Failure |
Clean |
N/A |
|
Paso Robles Ford, Paso Robles, CA |
3/16/2005 |
Ford |
Good |
Normal |
Dirty |
N/A |
|
Peak Nissan, Littleton, CO |
4/10/2005 |
Nissan |
Good |
Normal |
Dirty |
N/A |
|
Mossy Nissan, El Cajon, CA |
5/5/2005 |
Nissan |
Bad |
Out of Range |
Dirty |
Silicone |
|
Antelope Valley Volkswagen, Palmdale, CA |
5/12/2005 |
VW |
Bad |
Out of Range |
Dirty |
Silicone |
|
Bob Boyd Lincoln-Mercury, Columbus, OH |
5/13/2005 |
Ford |
Good |
Normal |
Clean |
N/A |
|
Toyota Carlsbad, Oceanside, CA |
6/3/2005 |
Toyota |
Good |
Normal |
Dirty |
Silicone |
|
Stevens Creek Lexus, Santa Clara, CA |
6/30/2005 |
Lexus |
| |